John MacArthur’s series of articles on social justice,
beginning with “Social Justice and the Gospel”, will be interesting to read.
A few initial thoughts:
These articles are quite a long time coming. On the one
hand, it would be desired that someone of MacArthur’s influence speak sooner.
On the other, swiftness to hear and slowness to speak is also wise and
biblical. Whatever might be preferred, perhaps the delay means we will hear a
more balanced and gracious response than the hot-takes of Internet
Reformed-dom.
From my perspective, great damage has been done by some of
MacArthur’s colleagues and others in the same/similar socio-political and
theological camp: Phil Johnson, Fred Butler, James White etc.
The first article tells a story that I was familiar with
about MacArthur’s visit to MLK’s assassination site with his friends Perkins
and Evers. There is a sense of reverence for the place, and respect for MLK
(otherwise, why the visit and why is this a sad but special memory worth
repeating?) and of love for Perkins and Evers. There is also an anecdotal
glimpse at MacArthur as a man who was willing to step into the black man’s world
in a time of great struggle.
Much of the current dialogue in Christian circles has
revolved around the highly significant MLK50 conference, which aimed to present
gospel reflections on racial reconciliation strategically coinciding with the
50th anniversary of MLK’s assassination.
Much of the conversation on the pro-social justice side has
been pushback against criticism of the conference in general and some of the
messages in particular.
The conference was written-off by some as soon as it was
announced for no more than its name. It was alleged to be a celebration of a
theological liberal and adulterer when it was of course no such thing. Critics
have enthusiastically pulled out every bad thing they could to say about MLK.
Some emphasised allegations of adultery, others of plagiarism, several of
theological liberalism, and some all of the above whilst repeating the anti-Civil
Rights trope of Marxism.
Others took aim at the speakers. One of the earliest online
conversations I observed before MLK50 was about none other than...MacArthur’s
friend John Perkins. Buzzwords used to write-off Perkins were “emergent”,
“progressive”, “Marxist”, “socialist” and so forth. It was then claimed that he
actually does sound biblical but some of the people he has written or spoken
with call his judgement into question. “He, being older, may not understand all
the implications of working alongside ____” it was condescendingly suggested to
me.
The gusto with which this was done was disconcerting to say
the least. The weeks have turned into months of tweets, podcasts, and blogposts
pouring vats of vitriol and snark on the conference and anyone - especially
black people - who claim there are still problems in American society that need
addressing. These months have been sadly very revealing of blind eyes at best,
non-confessional, unrepentant hearts at worst.
Perhaps MacArthur’s articles will bring some balance and
correction to the unhelpful exhortations and in some cases unhinged excesses of
anti-social justice critics.
I am concerned though, that it will simply be another series
easily co-opted by MacArthur devotees in the anti-social justice crowd to build
their conspiracy theory that conflates concern for oft-neglected biblical
social justice, particularly as expressed in racial reconciliation, with the false
social gospel.
I guess we shall see.
Post-script:
Since writing, I have come across a very
helpful piece by Brad Mason at Heart and Mouth that voices more in depth some
of the concerns that I have: John MacArthur enter the Fray on Racial Reconciliation
Also this piece, by Travis Roberts at Relevant: Everything wrong with John MacArthur's Attack on Racial Reconciliation
For anyone still wondering what social justice is, exactly, Joe Carter's article at TGC is probably the best summary I've seen: The FAQs: What Christians Should Know About Social Justice.
Also this piece, by Travis Roberts at Relevant: Everything wrong with John MacArthur's Attack on Racial Reconciliation
For anyone still wondering what social justice is, exactly, Joe Carter's article at TGC is probably the best summary I've seen: The FAQs: What Christians Should Know About Social Justice.
Post post script: It occurs to me that the timing of this series launch coincides with the anniversary of the appalling events at Charlottesville last year, and follows this past weekend's Unite the Right white supremacist rally through the streets of the USA's capital. Very poor timing, and frankly tone deaf. Perhaps instead of a long-overdue series that is clearly set to argue against "social justice", a word in season against the clear and present danger of ongoing social injustice would have been more appropriate.
this preoccupation with so called 'racial justice' is nowhere found in the Word of God. In fact i challenge anyone to state a verse that names this is a sin that has to be rectified by us.The Lord is the judge who will on that day right every wrong. Since when are we called to BLAME and ACT as judge of a person/people/culture for sins of the past/fathers? This attempt by fallen humanity to judge the living over 'perceived' racist sins of the past/history has no place in our faith. Within the body of Christ We are called to live as if there is no difference between races "...there is neither Jew nor Greek". Sad to say it is support for this political ideology of 'positive discrimmination and diversity' which is in fact increasing the divide,hatred and resentment within our society by emphasising and highlighting the perceived grudges between races. John Mcarthur is absolutely spot on when he highlights the need to return to living and spreading the Gospel as the main thing necessary, and not this counter productive preoccupation with fallen political ideologies.
ReplyDelete