Wednesday, January 07, 2015

Examining “Exodus: Gods and Kings” - GBC Bulletin Column #68



One of the biggest films of this holiday season is Ridley Scott’s “Exodus: God’s and Kings”, a cinematic portrayal of the Hebrew’s deliverance from slavery in Egypt...at least, it is supposed to be. The film, while artistically excellent, is seriously and fundamentally flawed. I do not expect movies based on books (even the Bible) to play out exactly as on the page. I do however expect such films to be consistent with the core story and spirit of the source material. While there are many problems with the movie, Ridley Scott’s film is a colossal failure at such consistency particularly in two vital areas: the character of Moses and the character of God.

Moses. The movie’s Moses (Christian Bale) is a soldier. While still in Pharaoh’s household, he serves as a war general (not implausible and consistent with various Jewish traditions).When he returns to Egypt after his exile in Midian, he attempts to get things moving toward freedom by creating and training a force of Hebrew freedom fighters who go on a destructive if not particularly effective campaign of guerrilla-war style sabotage. Moses does not carry the “staff of God” important in the biblical account, but the sword from his Egyptian army days gets plenty of screen-time. Whatever he might have been in the early days of his adult life, the biblical Moses did not remain a soldier, but he became a servant. Biblical Moses was so acutely aware of his own human inadequacy for the task of leading Israel that he was not comfortable to so much as open his mouth in the presence of Pharaoh, never mind hold a sword to Pharaoh's neck as movie Moses does during their first post-Midian on-screen confrontation. The biblical Moses doesn’t need a sword – when he gets started, he is like a god to Pharaoh: unyielding, persistent, and not questioning that the great I AM of Israel will work wonders to mightily redeem his people.

God. The angel of the Lord who serves as Yahweh’s messenger/representative (indistinguishable to many viewers from Yahweh himself) is immediately distasteful: a pre-adolescent British boy with a cruel scowl and a bad attitude who seems to be playing dice – literally, as well as figuratively with Moses, the Israelites, and the Egyptians. One cannot sense any of the grace, mercy, and redeeming love that drove Yahweh’s mission to save his people. He does not give Pharaoh repeated opportunities through Moses to let the people go: Moses appeals to Ramses in some form a maximum of three times. Furthermore, the Scriptural “mighty hand and outstretched arm” of Yahweh is absent: the plagues, at least in part, are portrayed as having wholly naturalistic explanations, the parting of the Red Sea is more of a tidal abnormality caused apparently by a falling meteor, and Moses is left to chisel out the Ten Commandments as God serves him tea (no, seriously...). The title card said that God had not forgotten his people and at one point Moses repeatedly roars “God is with us!”, but the viewer might well wonder how either of these are genuinely depicted on screen.

Is Exodus as bad as 2014's earlier (un)Biblical epic, Noah? Aronofsky's film starring Russell Crowe as a divinely appointed psychotic animal rights activist was laced with dark and dangerous Gnostic and Kabbalistic content but was so hilariously bizarre it could not be taken seriously. It would take a lot for Exodus to be as bad as Noah. On another level, though, it may very well be worse, precisely because of it's believability and the skill with which it is portrayed. Unlike Noah, Exodus can be taken seriously. Therein lies both its problem, and its potential. After Noah's release, there was a massive global spike in people reading the book of Genesis online. I overheard young people talking about biblical themes in public places. Although no one responded to my own drive to get people to meet up with me to discuss the movie and discover the real story, I was able to have several good conversations outside my local cinema after showings. What gospel opportunity might Exodus present? Many, I think. 

Exodus is cinematically epic, artistically beautiful, well cast, well acted, complex, engaging and thought-provoking, at once both devastating and triumphant. It also bears deep scars of liberal theological influence and horribly distorts the characters of both Moses and God. I went to see this movie. You don’t have to (might I recommend The Hobbit:Battle of the Five Armies or Unbroken instead?). I'm not saying you should lauch a hostile Facebook campaign, boycott the film, picket outside cinemas, vandalise billboards, or on the less extreme side try to keep other people from watching it. Instead, this is an opportunity to point people from the film (which they probably have watched or plan to) toward the Scriptures. Don't excoriate the movie to the point you forget to exploit potential gospel opportunities and neglect effective evangelistic engagement.

This was printed in the worship bulletin of Grace Baptist Church (Wood Green) on 04 January 2015. Starting 11 January, I will be delivering a mini-series from Exodus entitled "Wonders: The Power of Exodus's God and King" - if you know anyone nearby who might be interested, point them our way!

No comments:

Post a Comment