Tuesday, April 15, 2014

Engaging with 'Noah' – GBC Bulletin Column #47

Despite its awesomely epic (and incredibly deceptive) first trailer, Darren Aronofsky’s telling of Noah is both horribly bad and hilariously bizarre, but I don’t think we should ignore the film. Here’s why.

‘Noah’ occasionally gets the biblical story right. In fact, I dare-say that broadly speaking, the film has more in common with the much of the spirit of the story than many ‘Christian’ portrayals of the biblical account. Empire magazine wrote that it is a far cry from the sappy Sunday school take on these verses from Genesis.” I have heard Noah described as “brutal” and “disturbing” – which is exactly how it should be; there is, after all, nothing cute or kid-friendly about God saving eight people and an ark-load of animals while the rest of the world drowns. Three scenes stand out in my mind. The first of these is when Noah (a suitably grim Russell Crowe) goes to the city to find wives for Ham and Japheth. It is a scene cloaked in darkness contrasted only with flickering flame that symbolically seems to rain down on the city at its conclusion. Chaos reigns and viewers understand what Noah’s grandfather Methuselah (Anthony Hopkins) meant when he said ‘Man corrupted this world and filled it with violence, so we must be destroyed.” The second of the three goes beyond the horror of man’s sin to its horrific consequences before the Creator.  Noah and his family sit on the ark as the rains pour and the waves crash. The noise of the waters is outdone only by the screams of the drowning world outside, some of whom are shown desperately clinging to a mountain peak in a vain attempt to survive. The scene is sad, sobering, and potentially soul-shaking.  The third scene is after the flood, when a PTSD Noah finds some grapes and drinks himself into a naked stupor on the beach. We already know it (especially due to some highly questionable extra-biblical stuff that happens on the ark), but this movingly reminds us of Noah’s human frailty and total depravity.

‘Noah’ often gets the biblical story wrong. Looking from the big picture of the film into the details, there is much that is problematic – I can hardly skim the surface of the issues that come up in the movie. The film owes more to Kabbalistic Jewish mysticism and rabbinical midrash than to the biblical texts and corroborative Judeo-Christian tradition. Rock-encrusted fallen angels help Noah build the ark (demons helping someone obey the Lord!? That's a first), a bad guy (Ray Winstone) hacks into the ark and hides before ultimately attempting to kill Noah, who is tormented by the delusion that the Creator really wants to save only the animals therefore humanity MUST die out…leading him ultimately to charge around the ark with a knife trying to kill his newborn granddaughters. Totally weird. I didn’t even mention the Satanic magic serpent skin relic that gets passed around as a symbol of covenantal blessing! As an allegory of what humanity is capable of (yes, even ‘righteous’ Noah), the film is admittedly an at times fascinating study that also demonstrates the consequences of reading more into God’s plan than what he has revealed. But that raises more problems – Noah goes psycho because God’s revelation, given in the film through drugged-tea induced hallucinations, is not clear enough to him. In the Bible, God is very clear. Also, the Biblical story of Noah is not allegory. It is history. 

‘Noah’ provides gospel opportunities. “Everything that is good and perfect, we shattered”, movie Noah says. The people around you know and feel this truth. Through his visit to the city, Noah is forced to confront the sin in his own heart, and in his family in a sort of ‘there is no one righteous, not even one’ moment. The movie answers the absence of works-righteousness with…more works-righteousness. The demon rock monsters are received back into heaven after helping and protecting Noah and his family. After his odd foray into slasher-flic villain mode comes to an end with a grandfatherly kiss, Noah also finds redemption: his daughter-in-law has a heart-to-heart with him in which she reminds dad-in-law (and by extension, the audience) about the natural goodness in us all. Those who recognise the complete shattering of humanity’s perfection can spot the contradiction. We don’t have the ability to pick up the pieces and heal ourselves. Jesus does, and he goes beyond restoring what was broken: he creates a new person in his righteousness (2 Cor. 5:17, Eph. 4:24, Col. 3:10). At the end of time before the beginning of eternity he will judge the world, and all who are not counted righteous before the Lord will be eternally punished, and all who are counted as righteous by grace through faith in Christ will be eternally rewarded as they dwell in a new heaven and a new earth.

Evidence suggests that Noah, while dreadful as a biblical adaptation, has people reading, thinking, and talking about biblical things. Let’s join the conversation, and let’s bring the truth about God’s revelation, creation’s corruption, man’s redemption, and the beginning of a new earth with us.

This was printed in the worship bulletin of Grace Baptist Church (Wood Green) on 13 April 2014.

4 comments:

  1. Hi Ryan...

    Interested to read your thoughts - glad you see the potential in the film to engage with our culture on subjects of eternal significance (Biblegateway report huge increases in those searching for Gen. 6-9) and to talk about sin, righteousness and what it means to fear God as Creator.

    Feel it's a shame you see the film as hilariously bizarre...is this simply because you were looking to it to faithfully retell the Biblical story (which would have led to a very dull film indeed)? Most church ministers who've done some sort of theology degree would have been grounded in Midrash, other Ancient Near Eastern creation accounts (e.g. Gilgamesh, Atrahasis) and pseudepigraphal writings to give them a basic understanding of where the gap-filling elements of the film come from...can't see how filling a Jewish account with Jewish tradition is 'hilariously bizarre'...I thought it was a great introduction for our congregation to some of the major themes we'll be exploring in a sermon series on Genesis 1-3 later this year. For instance...

    What does it mean to live in fear of the Creator?
    How do we live in light of both God’s justice and God’s mercy?
    What is a man? What is his task on earth?
    Were Adam and Eve immortal in the Garden? Can mankind be immortal now?
    Should we still see the creation as the waters of chaos brought to order?
    Does Genesis 1 advocate environmentalism or the pillaging of the earth?
    Was the flood an un-doing of day 2 of creation?
    Were Cain’s line only wicked? Were Seth’s line only good?
    What do we know about the fallen angels known as the Nephilim / the Watchers in Genesis 6?
    How did Noah build the ark?

    Anyway, despite it's (necessary) extra-biblical material, let's use this film to spark conversations and interest with those wanting to engage...

    Kind regards,

    Tim Martin
    Associate Minister
    Cambray Baptist Church

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Tim

    Thank you for reading them. Yes – the bit about ‘evidence’ at the end was a somewhat veiled reference to the Bible Gateway study, as well as my personal experience. It’s not often I hear teen-aged youths discussing bible-related stuff on the train, or that I’m able to engage in substantive conversations outside a cinema!

    I’m not so sure that the Bible story ‘would have led to a very dull film indeed!’ In the text I see men multiplying, angels rebelling and hooking up with the women of earth, mighty men of renown roaming the earth and filling it with violence, the Lord purposing to destroy the earth and choosing to save one man and his family. Noah walked with God, built the ark (which was filled with animals), and preached righteousness (a rabbinic midrash I once came across puts a pretty powerful plea for the world to repent in his mouth that could/should be given from any biblically faithful pulpit today). They safely floated as the earth flooded and all the world drowned beneath them. They didn’t know what would happen next but it says ‘God remembered them’ and eventually the waters receded and they were brought out safely, God making covenant with them, and finally, of course, the incident with the wine and Ham. There is in fact loads to work with, and I haven’t even mentioned the wealth of Jewish and Christian literature that exists that is consistent with the biblical account. I at least expect faithfulness to the spirit of the story.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Never fear – while there is always more to learn I am grateful for an academically rigorous theological education that introduced me to the Apocrypha and rabbinic midrash (the post preceding this one features a promotional card for a meet up I advertised engaging with these themes in ‘Noah’ ... I have read the a good translation of the Epic of Gilgamesh, and frankly do not see how it influenced this film in any significant way at all. The flood story in it is not the main point and really quite minimal, told to the main character by a significant but supporting character who appears well into and headed towards the end of the epic). Even then though, Aronofsky turns Jewish tradition on its head:

    The Watchers of 1 Enoch are the sons of God in Genesis 6. The Nephilim are their offspring. They are not one and the same although the movie and certainly movie-goers seem to confuse the two. Jewish tradition makes these a focal point of God’s wrath in the flood. Rest assured, they weren’t on Noah’s side. That they team up with Noah in the movie, help him build the ark, defend it from wicked men, and find redemption and acceptance back into heaven by the Creator is I think hilariously bizarre. The audience at my cinema thought so too, a little too much in fact. One of the many point at which they busted out laughing was when the Tinker-Bell like fairies left the rock that encrusted them and floated up to heaven.
    The rather cool Jewish story of Methuselah slaying heaps of demonic beings with the sword of the Lord has become Methuselah slaying heaps of humans in defense of the demonic beings. So opposite the original story that it is again, hilariously bizarre.
    The ‘looking for a wife’ sub plot. Nowhere do we see anything about only Shem having a wife on the ark. This is contrived in a way to make Noah callous, then cruel, and finally downright crazy. Ham’s girlfriend of 5 minutes getting trampled to death as Noah looks on, Horror-movie Noah with his firebombs and knife...all of this was stuff I couldn’t take seriously, and again judging by the laughter of the secular audience around me, others couldn’t either.
    And again, what’s with the skin of Eden’s serpent being used like some power-giving amulet?

    More useful in looking at this film were my findings in Kabbalistic mysticism. Other perspectives on the film would concur (http://theologicalmatters.com.s178426.gridserver.com/?p=3719 is a good one that also has links to two other articles on the subject. Al Mohler has also touched on the Gnostic side of things in his breakdown of the films faulty view of God).

    So I unrepentantly think the film is hilariously bizarre. But I agree with you that it serves as a good spring-board for engaging our congregations and our culture with the gospel! Let's do it for the glory of God.

    Kind Regards

    Ryan King

    ReplyDelete
  4. I never knew that there will be a time where my husband can no longer look into my eyes and tells me he loves me. I suffered heart break when my husband left home to be with another lady in her apartment without caring for me and our lovely daughter. I had to do 3 shifts every day to pay my bills and also take care of my daughter. Last month, I came across an article online saying how Lord Zakuza as been so helpful to a lots of people in the restoration to their broken love lives. I contacted him through this Email: Lordzakuza7@gmail.com and he told me that he will restore my marriage within 48 hours with his magical powers and I believed in his words that my husband will come back and “wow”, within 48 hours after I contacted Lord Zakuza, my husband came back begging saying he didn’t know what came over him that he’s sorry and promised never to abandon I and our daughter again I am so grateful to him for restoring my marriage.. WhatsApp this number +1 (740) 573-9483 for more inquiries if you need his help.

    ReplyDelete